home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: acs1.star.net!news
- From: strudeau@star.net (Scot J. Trudeau)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Hayes vs USR
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 01:38:48 GMT
- Organization: For the CDA: youstupiddumbshitgoddamnmotherfucker!
- Message-ID: <3123da3a.23164124@news1.star.net>
- References: <MODEMS-L%96020804065347@VM.ITS.RPI.EDU>
- Reply-To: strudeau@star.net
- NNTP-Posting-Host: boston41p.star.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/16.182
-
- In message <MODEMS-L%96020804065347@VM.ITS.RPI.EDU>,
- Turgut Kalfaoglu <TURGUT%TREARN.BITNET@VM.ITS.RPI.EDU> wrote:
-
- >I have a Hayes Optima 28.8.. - and it's excellent.. Data Communications
- >magazine had done some REAL and EXTENSIVE tests, and Hayes Optima had come
- >up on top. Btw, Data Communications is *highly* recommended to anyone
- >in the communications business.
-
- Don't believe everything you read in magazine test.
-
- >For *compatibility* however, I hear that they are surpassed by USR.
- >I do not (yet) have a USR to try, but Hayes is both reliable (in a busy
- >BBS environment) and fast..
-
- If they are so reliable, how come I have to disable the 3249 v.34 symbol
- rate in my Courier to connect to Optima rackmounts? After that though,
- now problems connection wise. :)
-
- --
- Scot J. Trudeau
- strudeau@star.net
- http://www.star.net/people/~strudeau/
-